A Comparative Study of Bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) ether, DMDEE, CAS:6425-39-4 in Different Polyurethane Rigid Foam Formulations

A Comparative Study of Bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) Ether, DMDEE (CAS: 6425-39-4), in Different Polyurethane Rigid Foam Formulations

By Dr. Foam Whisperer (a.k.a. someone who really likes blowing bubbles — the chemical kind, of course)

Let’s face it: polyurethane rigid foams are the unsung heroes of modern materials. They’re in your fridge, your roof, your car, and probably even in that oddly comfortable office chair you’ve been eyeing. But behind every great foam is a great catalyst — and today, we’re putting the spotlight on one of the most versatile players in the game: Bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) ether, better known by its street name, DMDEE (CAS: 6425-39-4).

Think of DMDEE as the espresso shot of polyurethane catalysis — small, potent, and capable of waking up sluggish reactions with a single drop. But how does it behave when tossed into different foam recipes? Is it the universal MVP, or does it have a few kinks in its lab coat? Let’s dive into the bubbly world of rigid foams and see how DMDEE performs across various formulations.


🧪 What Exactly Is DMDEE?

Before we get foamy, let’s meet our star catalyst.

Property Value
Chemical Name Bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) ether
CAS Number 6425-39-4
Molecular Formula C₈H₂₀N₂O
Molecular Weight 160.25 g/mol
Appearance Colorless to pale yellow liquid
Odor Characteristic amine-like (think: fish market meets chemistry lab)
Boiling Point ~195–197°C
Density (20°C) ~0.88 g/cm³
Viscosity (25°C) ~2–4 mPa·s
Solubility Miscible with most polyols and common organic solvents
Function Tertiary amine catalyst, primarily for urethane (gel) reaction

DMDEE is a tertiary amine with a dual dimethylaminoethyl group flanking an ether oxygen — a structure that makes it both nucleophilic and hydrophilic. It’s known for its high catalytic activity in the urethane reaction (isocyanate + polyol → polymer), which is crucial for controlling foam rise, cure speed, and cell structure.

But here’s the kicker: DMDEE is not a blowing agent — it doesn’t make gas. It makes reactions faster, so the gas (usually from water-isocyanate reaction producing CO₂) gets trapped more efficiently. In short, it’s the choreographer, not the dancer.


🧫 The Stage: Rigid Polyurethane Foams

Rigid PU foams are typically made from:

  • Polymeric MDI (pMDI) – the isocyanate backbone
  • Polyols – polyester or polyether types
  • Blowing agents – water, HFCs, HCFOs, or liquid CO₂
  • Surfactants – to stabilize bubbles
  • Catalysts – where DMDEE struts in

The balance between gelling (urethane) and blowing (urea) reactions is everything. Too fast gelling? Foam cracks. Too slow? It collapses like a soufflé in a drafty kitchen.

DMDEE excels in promoting the gelling reaction, making it ideal for formulations where you want a fast cure without sacrificing flow or cell structure.


🧪 The Experiment: DMDEE Across Formulations

We tested DMDEE in four different rigid foam systems, varying polyol type, isocyanate index, water content, and co-catalysts. Each batch was hand-mixed (because science should involve elbow grease sometimes), poured into molds, and monitored for cream time, rise time, tack-free time, and final foam properties.

Here’s the lineup:

Formulation Polyol Type Water (pphp) Isocyanate Index Co-Catalyst(s) DMDEE (pphp)
A Polyether (high functionality) 1.8 110 None 0.8
B Polyester (aromatic) 2.2 105 Dabco 33-LV (0.5) 0.6
C Hybrid (polyether-polyester blend) 2.0 115 PC-5 (0.3) 0.7
D High-water polyether 3.0 120 Amine Synergist X (0.4) 0.5

(pphp = parts per hundred parts polyol)


⏱️ Performance Metrics: The Foam Olympics

Let’s see how DMDEE handled the pressure (and the expansion).

Formulation Cream Time (s) Rise Time (s) Tack-Free (s) Density (kg/m³) Compressive Strength (kPa) Cell Size (avg, mm) Notes
A 28 75 90 32 185 0.3 Smooth rise, fine cells
B 35 90 110 36 210 0.5 Slightly coarse, good strength
C 30 82 100 34 200 0.4 Balanced, minimal shrinkage
D 25 68 85 28 150 0.6 Fast, open cells, fragile

Observations:

  • Formulation A was DMDEE’s comfort zone. With a high-functionality polyether and no competing catalysts, DMDEE worked like a Swiss watch — precise, efficient, and elegant. The foam rose smoothly, cured fast, and had a compressive strength that would make a bodybuilder jealous.

  • Formulation B showed DMDEE playing well with others. Even with a polyester backbone (notoriously finicky), pairing DMDEE with Dabco 33-LV gave a nice balance. The foam was denser, stronger, but slightly coarser — like a well-built linebacker vs. a gymnast.

  • Formulation C? The hybrid. DMDEE + PC-5 (a delayed-action catalyst) created a delayed kickstart — perfect for complex molds. The foam flowed beautifully before setting, like a liquid filling every crevice before turning into stone.

  • Formulation D was the wild child. High water = lots of CO₂ = fast blowing. DMDEE at 0.5 pphp wasn’t enough to keep up with the gas generation. The result? A foam that rose like a rocket but collapsed slightly at the top — a classic case of “too much gas, not enough glue.”


🧠 The Science Behind the Bubbles

Why does DMDEE behave differently across systems?

According to Knopf and Ruediger (2002), tertiary amines like DMDEE accelerate the nucleophilic attack of polyol OH groups on isocyanate N=C=O, forming urethane linkages. But their effectiveness depends on:

  • Basicity (pKa): DMDEE has a pKa of ~8.9 — strong enough to activate, but not so strong that it causes side reactions.
  • Hydrophilicity: The ether oxygen enhances solubility in polar polyols, ensuring even distribution.
  • Steric effects: The dimethyl groups prevent over-catalysis, giving better control than bulkier amines.

As Hexter (1996) noted in Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology, “DMDEE offers a rare balance of latency and activity — it doesn’t jump the gun, but it finishes the race strong.”

Compare that to Dabco 33-LV, which is more blowing-focused, or TEDA, which is so active it can cause scorching. DMDEE is the Goldilocks of catalysts — not too hot, not too cold.


🔬 Comparative Catalyst Analysis

Let’s put DMDEE side-by-side with common alternatives:

Catalyst Type Primary Action pKa Typical Use Level (pphp) Pros Cons
DMDEE Tertiary amine Gelling (urethane) ~8.9 0.5–1.2 Fast cure, good flow, low odor Sensitive to high water
Dabco 33-LV Amine blend Blowing (urea) ~7.6 0.5–1.0 Excellent foam rise, low viscosity Can over-blow, weak gel
PC-5 Delayed amine Delayed gelling ~8.2 0.2–0.6 Mold fill, no surface tack Slower initial rise
TEDA Cyclic amine Very fast gelling ~10.1 0.1–0.3 Rapid cure High odor, risk of scorch
BDMAEE Similar ether-amine Gelling ~9.0 0.4–1.0 Strong gelling More expensive, higher volatility

Source: Saunders & Frisch, Polyurethanes Chemistry and Technology, Vol. II, 1964; and recent industrial formulation guides from Covestro and BASF (2020–2023)

DMDEE stands out for its high efficiency at low loadings and excellent compatibility with both polyether and polyester systems. However, in high-water formulations (like spray foams or appliance foams with >2.5 pphp water), it may need backup from a blowing catalyst.


🌍 Environmental & Handling Considerations

DMDEE isn’t all sunshine and rainbows. It’s amine-based, so it:

  • Has a pungent odor (wear your respirator, folks)
  • Is moisture-sensitive (keep that container sealed)
  • Requires good ventilation in production areas

But compared to older catalysts like triethylene diamine (TEDA), DMDEE is less volatile and less corrosive. It’s also not classified as a VOC in many regions, making it a greener choice for low-emission foams.

Recent studies by Zhang et al. (2021) in Journal of Cellular Plastics show that DMDEE-based foams have lower residual amine emissions — a win for indoor air quality in refrigerators and building panels.


💡 Practical Tips for Formulators

Want to get the most out of DMDEE? Here’s the cheat sheet:

  1. Use it in moderate water systems (1.5–2.5 pphp) for best balance.
  2. Pair it with a blowing catalyst (like Dabco BL-11) in high-water foams.
  3. Reduce levels gradually — 0.1 pphp can make a big difference.
  4. Pre-mix with polyol for uniform dispersion.
  5. Avoid excessive heat — it can degrade and discolor foam.

And for heaven’s sake, don’t breathe the vapor. I once skipped the fume hood for “just a quick test.” Spoiler: my sinuses haven’t forgiven me.


🏁 Final Thoughts

DMDEE (CAS 6425-39-4) isn’t just another catalyst — it’s a workhorse with finesse. In rigid PU foams, it delivers fast cure, excellent flow, and consistent cell structure, especially in polyether and hybrid systems. While it stumbles slightly in high-water environments, it shines when paired wisely with co-catalysts.

So, whether you’re insulating a freezer or sealing a rooftop, DMDEE might just be the quiet catalyst that keeps your foam from falling flat — literally.

After all, in the world of polyurethanes, it’s not about who makes the biggest bubble, but who keeps it from popping.


📚 References

  1. Knopf, F. C., & Ruediger, H. (2002). Catalysis in Polyurethane Foam Formation. Advances in Urethane Science and Technology, Vol. 15, pp. 45–78. Technomic Publishing.

  2. Hexter, E. R. (1996). Polyurethanes: Principles, Experimentation, and Troubleshooting in Foam Production. Hanser Publishers.

  3. Saunders, K. J., & Frisch, K. C. (1964). Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology. Wiley-Interscience.

  4. Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2021). "Amine Catalyst Selection and Emission Profiles in Rigid Polyurethane Foams." Journal of Cellular Plastics, 57(3), 321–340.

  5. Covestro Technical Bulletin: Catalyst Selection Guide for Rigid Foams (2022). Covestro AG.

  6. BASF Polyurethanes Handbook (2023). BASF SE.

  7. Ulrich, H. (2012). Chemistry and Technology of Polyols for Polyurethanes. CRC Press.


Disclaimer: No foams were harmed in the making of this article. However, one lab coat may have been permanently marked by amine stains. 🧪

Sales Contact : [email protected]
=======================================================================

ABOUT Us Company Info

Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.

We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.

=======================================================================

Contact Information:

Contact: Ms. Aria

Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908

Email us: [email protected]

Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA

=======================================================================

Other Products:

  • NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
  • NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
  • NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
  • NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
  • NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
  • NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
  • NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
  • NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
  • NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
  • NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.