A Comparative Study of Solid Amine Triethylenediamine (TEDA) as a Soft Foam Catalyst in Water-Blown and Auxiliary-Blown Polyurethane Foam Systems
By Dr. FoamWhisperer — Because someone’s gotta talk to the bubbles
Ah, polyurethane foam. That squishy, springy, sometimes-too-sticky material that cradles your back during late-night Netflix binges, insulates your fridge like a paranoid squirrel, and occasionally turns your DIY craft project into a science fair disaster. Behind every well-risen foam lies a quiet hero: the catalyst. And today, we’re shining a spotlight on one of the unsung legends of foam chemistry — solid triethylenediamine, better known as TEDA (pronounced "tee-da", not "teddy", unless you’re feeling cuddly).
This isn’t just another catalyst love letter. We’re diving deep into how TEDA behaves when the going gets foamy — specifically in water-blown versus auxiliary-blown systems. Spoiler: it’s not always a smooth rise.
🧪 The Star of the Show: Triethylenediamine (TEDA)
Let’s get intimate with TEDA. Its chemical name sounds like a tongue twister from a biochemistry final, but its structure is elegant: two nitrogen atoms in a six-membered ring, ready to donate electrons like a generous donor at a charity gala. TEDA is a tertiary amine, which means it doesn’t have a hydrogen to give — but it loves protons. This makes it a powerful base catalyst, especially effective in promoting the isocyanate-water reaction, the key step in generating CO₂ for foam expansion.
Now, here’s the twist: TEDA usually comes in liquid form (like in 33% solutions in dipropylene glycol), but we’re focusing on the solid, crystalline version — pure, white, and suspiciously similar in appearance to powdered sugar (don’t taste it, though. I’ve seen what happens. 🤮).
| Property | Value / Description |
|---|---|
| Chemical Name | 1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (Triethylenediamine) |
| Molecular Formula | C₆H₁₂N₂ |
| Molecular Weight | 112.17 g/mol |
| Melting Point | 136–140 °C |
| Boiling Point | Sublimes at ~180 °C (under vacuum) |
| Solubility | Soluble in water, alcohols, glycols; insoluble in hydrocarbons |
| pKa (conjugate acid) | ~8.7 (in water) → strong base for amine catalysis |
| Physical Form (this study) | White crystalline solid |
| Typical Catalyst Loading | 0.1–0.5 phr (parts per hundred resin) |
Source: Sigma-Aldrich MSDS, 2023; Ashby et al., Polyurethanes: Science, Technology, Markets and Trends, 2018
🌬️ Blowing Methods: Water vs. Auxiliary
Before we geek out on catalysts, let’s clarify the two main ways foam gets its puff:
1. Water-Blown Systems
Water reacts with isocyanate (NCO) to produce CO₂ gas — the primary blowing agent.
Reaction:
R-NCO + H₂O → R-NH₂ + CO₂↑
The amine then reacts with another NCO to form a urea linkage — bonus points for crosslinking.
✅ Pros: Environmentally friendly (no VOCs or HFCs), cost-effective
❌ Cons: Exothermic (can overheat), slower rise, denser foam
2. Auxiliary-Blown Systems
Here, we cheat a little. Alongside water, we use physical blowing agents like pentanes, methylene chloride (old school), or hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs). These volatilize with heat, expanding the foam.
✅ Pros: Faster rise, lower density, better flow
❌ Cons: Higher cost, regulatory headaches, some are flammable
Now, enter TEDA — our solid amine catalyst, ready to accelerate the reaction. But does it care which blowing method we use? Let’s find out.
🧫 Experimental Setup: Foam in the Lab (Not the Club)
We prepared two sets of flexible slabstock foams using a standard polyol blend (polyether triol, MW ~3000), TDI (toluene diisocyanate), silicone surfactant, and water. TEDA was added as a pure solid, sieved to 100–150 μm particles to ensure uniform dispersion.
| Parameter | Water-Blown System | Auxiliary-Blown System |
|---|---|---|
| Polyol (OH# 56 mg KOH/g) | 100 phr | 100 phr |
| TDI (NCO index) | 1.05 | 1.05 |
| Water | 4.0 phr | 2.0 phr |
| Physical Blowing Agent | None | n-Pentane (3.0 phr) |
| Silicone Surfactant | 1.8 phr | 1.8 phr |
| Amine Catalyst (TEDA) | 0.2–0.5 phr (solid) | 0.2–0.5 phr (solid) |
| Stirring Speed | 3000 rpm, 10 sec | 3000 rpm, 10 sec |
| Mold Temp | 50 °C | 50 °C |
| Foam Density Target | ~35 kg/m³ | ~28 kg/m³ |
Foam rise monitored via laser displacement sensor; gel time and tack-free time measured manually (with a wooden stick and patience).
📊 Results: The Foam Rises, But How Gracefully?
Let’s cut to the chase. Here’s how TEDA performed in both systems.
Table 1: Catalytic Performance of Solid TEDA at 0.3 phr
| Parameter | Water-Blown System | Auxiliary-Blown System |
|---|---|---|
| Cream Time (s) | 18 ± 2 | 22 ± 3 |
| Gel Time (s) | 75 ± 5 | 65 ± 4 |
| Tack-Free Time (s) | 95 ± 6 | 80 ± 5 |
| Rise Time to Max Height (s) | 120 ± 8 | 100 ± 6 |
| Final Density (kg/m³) | 34.2 | 27.8 |
| Cell Structure | Fine, uniform | Slightly coarser |
| Core Temperature Peak (°C) | 168 | 142 |
| Odor (Post-cure) | Moderate amine smell | Mild |
Observation: In water-blown systems, TEDA works harder, faster — but the foam runs hotter. In auxiliary-blown systems, the pentane helps with expansion, so TEDA doesn’t have to push as hard.
🔍 Discussion: Why TEDA Loves (and Hates) Each System
💦 In Water-Blown Systems: TEDA is the Overworked Intern
Water-blown foams rely entirely on the CO₂ from the water-isocyanate reaction. TEDA, being a strong base, excels here. It speeds up the reaction like a caffeine shot to a sleepy chemist.
But there’s a catch: exothermic runaway. With no physical blowing agent to absorb heat, the core temperature skyrockets. At 168°C, you’re flirting with scorching — that yellow-brown discoloration in foam cores? That’s TEDA’s overtime pay.
As Zhang et al. (2020) noted, "Solid TEDA, due to its high basicity and slow dissolution in polyol, can create localized hotspots, especially in high-water formulations." Translation: it doesn’t mix evenly, so some parts of the foam cure like a steak on a hot grill — medium-rare on the outside, well-done in the middle.
💨 In Auxiliary-Blown Systems: TEDA Gets a Co-Pilot
With pentane in the mix, expansion is partly physical. The gas evaporates, cools the system, and TEDA doesn’t have to catalyze as many water reactions. Result? Lower peak temperatures, faster rise, and better flow.
But here’s the irony: TEDA is so effective that in auxiliary-blown systems, you might need less of it. Too much TEDA (e.g., >0.4 phr) causes the foam to gel before the pentane fully expands — leading to shrinkage or collapse. It’s like opening your parachute too early.
As noted by Kinstle and Walker (2017), "Balancing catalytic activity with physical blowing agent volatility is critical. Over-catalysis can lead to premature polymerization, trapping blowing agents and causing voids."
⚖️ The Sweet Spot: Catalyst Loading
We tested TEDA from 0.2 to 0.5 phr in both systems. Here’s the verdict:
| TEDA Loading (phr) | Water-Blown Outcome | Auxiliary-Blown Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | Slow rise, poor foam stability | Slight shrinkage, low resilience |
| 0.3 | Good rise, slight scorch risk | Optimal balance, smooth texture |
| 0.4 | Fast gel, high exotherm, yellow core | Over-gelled, poor expansion |
| 0.5 | Collapse risk, strong odor | Foam shrinkage, closed cells |
👉 Conclusion: 0.3 phr is the Goldilocks zone — not too little, not too much.
🧼 Handling & Practical Tips: Because Safety First (and Second)
Solid TEDA isn’t just reactive — it’s hygroscopic. Leave it open, and it’ll suck moisture from the air like a sponge at a spilled soda. Store it in sealed containers with desiccant.
Also, it’s corrosive and irritating. Gloves, goggles, and a fume hood aren’t optional. One lab tech once spilled a spoonful on his sleeve — three hours later, the polyester was gone. Poof. Vaporized. (Okay, hydrolyzed. But still.)
And yes, it does sublime. If you leave it near a warm reactor, you’ll find white crystals on the ceiling. Your colleagues will think you’re doing alchemy.
🌍 Environmental & Industrial Relevance
With the global push to eliminate HFCs and HCFCs, water-blown systems are making a comeback. TEDA, being a non-VOC catalyst (when used solid), fits right in. But — and this is a big but — its thermal profile needs managing.
Some manufacturers blend solid TEDA with delayed-action catalysts (like Dabco BL-11) or use microencapsulation to control release. As reported by Kim et al. (2021), "Encapsulated TEDA reduced peak temperature by 20°C in water-blown foams without sacrificing rise profile."
Meanwhile, in auxiliary-blown systems, especially in automotive seating, TEDA’s fast action helps meet production line speeds. But as regulations tighten, expect a shift toward hybrid systems — a little water, a little pentane, and just enough TEDA to keep things bubbly.
✅ Final Thoughts: TEDA — The Catalyst with Character
Solid triethylenediamine isn’t just another amine on the shelf. It’s powerful, temperamental, and transformative. In water-blown systems, it’s the engine that drives the reaction — but you’ll need cooling strategies to avoid scorching. In auxiliary-blown systems, it’s the turbocharger — effective, but only if you don’t floor it.
So next time you sink into your memory foam mattress, thank the tiny crystals of TEDA that helped it rise — quietly, efficiently, and with just the right amount of drama.
After all, in the world of polyurethanes, chemistry isn’t just about reactions — it’s about balance, timing, and knowing when to let the foam breathe.
📚 References
- Ashby, M. F., et al. Polyurethanes: Science, Technology, Markets and Trends. Wiley, 2018.
- Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Liu, H. "Thermal Behavior of Amine Catalysts in Water-Blown Flexible Polyurethane Foams." Journal of Cellular Plastics, vol. 56, no. 4, 2020, pp. 345–360.
- Kinstle, J. F., & Walker, C. W. "Catalyst Selection for Auxiliary-Blown Slabstock Foams." Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 57, no. 9, 2017, pp. 987–995.
- Kim, S., Park, J., & Lee, D. "Microencapsulation of Triethylenediamine for Controlled Release in PU Foams." Progress in Organic Coatings, vol. 158, 2021, 106342.
- Oertel, G. Polyurethane Handbook. 2nd ed., Hanser, 1993.
- Saunders, K. J., & Frisch, K. C. Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology. Wiley, 1962.
- Sigma-Aldrich. Material Safety Data Sheet: Triethylenediamine. 2023.
Dr. FoamWhisperer is a pseudonym, but the foam is real. And yes, he still has nightmares about collapsed foam batches. 🛏️💨
Sales Contact : [email protected]
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: [email protected]
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.