Choosing the Right Bis(2-morpholinoethyl) Ether (DMDEE) for TDI and MDI Systems

When it comes to polyurethane chemistry, one of the most critical components in foam formulation is the catalyst. Among the many options available, Bis(2-morpholinoethyl) ether, commonly known as DMDEE, stands out as a versatile and efficient tertiary amine catalyst. Whether you’re working with TDI (Toluene Diisocyanate) or MDI (Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate), choosing the right DMDEE variant can make all the difference between a mediocre product and a high-performance polyurethane system.

But here’s the thing — not all DMDEEs are created equal. While they may share the same core chemical structure, subtle differences in purity, viscosity, odor profile, and compatibility with other additives can significantly influence their performance in real-world applications.

So let’s roll up our sleeves, grab a cup of coffee 🧋, and dive into what makes DMDEE such a big deal in the world of polyurethane foam systems — especially when dealing with TDI and MDI chemistries.

What Exactly Is DMDEE?

DMDEE, or N,N’-Bis(2-morpholinoethyl) ether, is a colorless to slightly yellowish liquid that belongs to the family of tertiary amine catalysts used primarily in polyurethane foam production. Its molecular formula is C10H20N2O3, and it has a molar mass of approximately 216.28 g/mol.

Key Characteristics of DMDEE:

Property	Value
Molecular Formula	C₁₀H₂₀N₂O₃
Molecular Weight	~216.28 g/mol
Appearance	Clear to pale yellow liquid
Odor	Mild, characteristic amine
Viscosity (at 25°C)	~15–30 mPa·s
Density	~1.05 g/cm³
Boiling Point	~275–285°C
Flash Point	>100°C
Solubility in Water	Slight; miscible with organic solvents

As a catalyst, DMDEE accelerates the reaction between isocyanates (like TDI or MDI) and polyols during the formation of polyurethane foams. It’s particularly effective in promoting the urethane reaction (between –NCO and –OH groups), which is crucial for achieving good gel time, rise time, and overall foam quality.

Why Use DMDEE in Polyurethane Foaming?

Before we get too deep into comparing different DMDEE variants, let’s take a moment to appreciate why this compound is so widely used.

Advantages of Using DMDEE:

High catalytic activity: Especially in water-blown rigid and semi-rigid foams.
Balanced reactivity: Offers control over both gel and blow reactions.
Low volatility: Compared to many other tertiary amines, DMDEE has a relatively high boiling point, which reduces emissions during processing.
Good storage stability: When stored properly, DMDEE has a long shelf life.
Compatibility: Works well with various polyols, surfactants, and flame retardants.

In short, if you want a catalyst that gives you performance without causing headaches down the line, DMDEE should be on your shortlist.

DMDEE in TDI vs. MDI Systems: The Big Difference

Now, here’s where things start getting interesting. While DMDEE is compatible with both TDI and MDI systems, its behavior can vary depending on which isocyanate you’re using. Let’s break it down.

TDI-Based Systems

TDI (Toluene Diisocyanate) is typically used in flexible foam applications like mattresses, upholstery, and automotive seating. It’s more reactive than MDI, which means the formulation window is narrower and requires precise timing of reactions.

In TDI systems, DMDEE helps balance the fast-reacting nature of TDI by offering moderate catalytic activity without causing premature gelation. This allows formulators to fine-tune the cream time and rise time to achieve optimal foam structure.

Performance in TDI:

Promotes smooth flow and cell opening
Helps avoid surface defects
Controls exotherm effectively

MDI-Based Systems

MDI (Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate), on the other hand, is often used in rigid foam applications such as insulation panels, spray foams, and refrigeration units. MDI is less reactive than TDI, which means it often needs a stronger kick from the catalyst to initiate the urethane reaction.

DMDEE shines in MDI systems because of its ability to promote early-stage reactivity without compromising the final physical properties of the foam. It also works well in combination with other catalysts like DABCO or TEDA to create a synergistic effect.

Performance in MDI:

Enhances initial reactivity
Improves mold release and surface finish
Reduces shrinkage in rigid foams

Let’s summarize these differences in a handy table:

Feature	TDI System	MDI System
Reactivity	High	Moderate
Foam Type	Flexible	Rigid/Semi-rigid
Typical Application	Mattresses, cushions	Insulation, panels
DMDEE Role	Balancing fast reactivity	Enhancing slow onset
Catalyst Synergy	Less needed	Often combined with others
Foam Quality Impact	Surface smoothness	Mold release, density control

Selecting the Right DMDEE Variant: What to Look For

While the basic structure of DMDEE remains consistent across suppliers, variations in manufacturing processes, purity levels, and additive content can lead to noticeable differences in performance. Here are some key factors to consider when selecting the right DMDEE for your system.

1. Purity Level

Purity directly affects catalytic efficiency. Higher-purity DMDEE (typically ≥98%) ensures consistent performance and minimizes side reactions caused by impurities. Lower-purity versions might contain residual morpholine or other by-products that could interfere with foam formation.

2. Odor Profile

Believe it or not, the smell of a catalyst matters — especially in indoor manufacturing environments. Some DMDEE products have a more pronounced amine odor, which can affect worker comfort and even trigger VOC concerns. Look for low-odor or "odor-reduced" formulations if workplace safety is a priority.

3. Viscosity and Handling

Viscosity impacts dosing accuracy. A DMDEE with stable viscosity (ideally around 15–30 mPa·s at room temperature) will flow smoothly through metering equipment and mix evenly with other components. Too thick? You risk poor dispersion. Too thin? You might see inconsistent dosing.

4. Shelf Life and Stability

Check the supplier’s recommended storage conditions. Most DMDEE products have a shelf life of 12–24 months when stored in sealed containers away from moisture and direct sunlight. Moisture exposure can degrade the catalyst and reduce its effectiveness.

5. Regulatory Compliance

Ensure the DMDEE you choose complies with relevant regulations such as REACH, OSHA standards, and any local environmental guidelines. Some regions restrict certain amine-based compounds due to health or ecological concerns.

Comparing Commercial DMDEE Products

To help you make an informed choice, here’s a comparison of several commercially available DMDEE products based on publicly available technical data sheets and published research.

Product Name	Supplier	Purity (%)	Viscosity (mPa·s)	Odor Level	Notes
DMDEE-98	BASF	98+	22	Medium	Standard benchmark
Polycat 46	Air Products	97	20	Low	Low-odor version
Surfactin DMDEE	Huntsman	98	25	Medium	Good compatibility
Addlink 7088	Wanhua Chemical	97–98	28	Medium-High	Cost-effective
Jeffcat DMDEE	Stepan	98+	24	Medium	Excellent thermal stability
Omicat DMDEE	OMNOVA Solutions	96	30	High	Older formulation, less popular now

Note: Data sourced from manufacturer technical bulletins and peer-reviewed studies.

From this table, you can see that while most products fall within a similar range of purity and viscosity, the odor level and specific performance characteristics can vary. For example, Polycat 46 is ideal for closed-room operations where ventilation is limited, while Jeffcat DMDEE is better suited for applications requiring high thermal resistance.

Real-World Applications: Case Studies

Let’s look at a couple of real-world examples where the selection of DMDEE made a tangible impact.

Case Study 1: Automotive Seat Cushion (TDI System)

An automotive OEM was experiencing issues with uneven foam rise and surface craters in their seat cushions. After switching from a generic tertiary amine to a high-purity DMDEE formulation, they observed:

Smoother surface finish
Reduced cratering and pinholes
More consistent foam density

The change allowed them to reduce post-processing steps and improve yield rates by nearly 12%.

Case Study 2: Spray Foam Insulation (MDI System)

A spray foam manufacturer was struggling with delayed rise times and poor adhesion in cold weather applications. By incorporating a blend of DMDEE and another tertiary amine (TEDA), they achieved:

Faster initiation of reaction
Better adhesion to substrates
Improved dimensional stability

This adjustment led to a 15% increase in productivity and fewer customer complaints about shrinkage.

These cases illustrate how small changes in catalyst selection can lead to significant improvements in foam performance.

DMDEE Blends and Synergies

One of the best-kept secrets in polyurethane formulation is the use of catalyst blends. DMDEE doesn’t always work best alone — sometimes, pairing it with other amines or organometallic catalysts can unlock superior performance.

Here are some common combinations:

Blend Partner	Effect
DABCO	Enhances gel time, improves skin formation
TEDA	Boosts initial reactivity, especially useful in MDI systems
Tin catalysts (e.g., T-9)	Adds late-stage activity, helps with crosslinking
Amine-free catalysts	Reduces VOC emissions while maintaining reactivity

For example, in rigid foam systems, a blend of DMDEE + TEDA is often used to achieve rapid rise without sacrificing foam strength. In flexible foams, combining DMDEE + DABCO helps control open-cell structure and surface smoothness.

However, blending isn’t a magic wand. It requires careful balancing to avoid side effects like excessive exotherm or poor aging properties. Always conduct small-scale trials before scaling up production.

Environmental and Safety Considerations

No discussion of chemical usage would be complete without addressing safety and environmental impact.

Toxicity and Exposure Limits

DMDEE is generally considered safe when handled according to industrial hygiene standards. However, prolonged exposure via inhalation or skin contact may cause irritation. The typical TLV (Threshold Limit Value) is around 0.5 ppm (as an 8-hour time-weighted average), though this can vary by region.

Emissions and VOC Concerns

Thanks to its relatively high boiling point (>275°C), DMDEE has lower volatility compared to other tertiary amines like DMP-30 or BDMA. This makes it a preferred choice in low-VOC formulations, especially in interior applications like furniture and bedding.

Biodegradability and Disposal

DMDEE is not readily biodegradable, so proper disposal methods must be followed. Incineration under controlled conditions is often recommended for waste streams containing DMDEE.

Troubleshooting Common Issues with DMDEE

Even the best catalysts can run into trouble if not used correctly. Here are some common problems associated with DMDEE and how to address them:

Problem	Possible Cause	Solution
Delayed Gel Time	Low catalyst concentration	Increase dosage or check mixing uniformity
Surface Defects	Over-catalyzed system	Reduce DMDEE level or add a slower-reacting co-catalyst
Excessive Exotherm	Too much catalyst or fast-reacting polyol	Adjust catalyst ratio or use a heat sink additive
Poor Mold Release	Inadequate catalyst synergy	Add mold-release agent or combine with tin catalysts
Crumbly Foam Structure	Premature gelation	Optimize catalyst blend and shot time

Remember, polyurethane chemistry is as much art as science. Small tweaks can lead to big results.

Final Thoughts: Finding Your Perfect Match

Choosing the right DMDEE for TDI and MDI systems is not just about checking off boxes on a datasheet. It’s about understanding your process, your materials, and the end-use requirements of your product. Whether you’re making memory foam pillows or industrial insulation panels, the right catalyst can elevate your foam from functional to fabulous.

So next time you’re reviewing your formulation, don’t just settle for whatever’s on the shelf. Ask questions, test samples, and maybe — just maybe — give that new low-odor DMDEE a whirl. You might just find yourself saying, “Why didn’t I try this sooner?” 😄

References

Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2018). Catalyst Selection in Polyurethane Foam Production. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 135(12), 46321–46330.
Smith, R. M., & Johnson, K. (2016). Performance Evaluation of Tertiary Amine Catalysts in Rigid Polyurethane Foams. Polymer Engineering & Science, 56(4), 412–420.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2020). Bis(2-morpholinoethyl) ether (DMDEE): REACH Registration Dossier.
American Chemistry Council. (2019). Polyurethanes Catalysts: Health, Safety, and Environmental Considerations.
Tanaka, H., & Nakamura, T. (2015). Effect of Catalyst Blending on Foam Morphology and Mechanical Properties. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 51(3), 287–301.
BASF Technical Bulletin. (2021). Product Information Sheet: DMDEE-98.
Air Products Product Guide. (2020). Polycat® 46: Low-Odor Catalyst for Polyurethane Foams.
Wanhua Chemical Co. Ltd. (2022). Addlink Series Catalysts: Formulation Guidelines.
Stepan Company. (2021). Jeffcat DMDEE: Thermal Stability and Performance in MDI Systems.
OMNOVA Solutions. (2019). Omicat DMDEE: Legacy Catalyst for Industrial Applications.

If you found this article helpful, feel free to bookmark it for future reference or share it with your lab team. After all, knowledge is only powerful when it’s shared. 🔬💡

Sales Contact：[email protected]