Optimizing the Performance of Huntsman Suprasec 2379 in Rigid Polyurethane Foam Production for High-Efficiency Thermal Insulation Systems
By Dr. Elena Marquez, Senior Formulation Chemist, Nordic Insulation Labs
📍 Copenhagen, Denmark
🌡️ “Cold is not the enemy—inefficient insulation is.”
That’s what I scribbled on the whiteboard during my first week at the lab. And ever since, I’ve been chasing the perfect foam—the kind that laughs at Arctic winds and keeps your sandwich warm in a freezer truck. Enter Huntsman Suprasec 2379, the unsung hero of rigid polyurethane (PUR) foams. This isn’t just another isocyanate; it’s the backbone of high-performance insulation in refrigerators, cold storage, and building envelopes.
But here’s the catch: Suprasec 2379 doesn’t automatically deliver stellar performance. Like a race car, it needs the right fuel, tuning, and driver. In this article, I’ll walk you through how to optimize this beast for high-efficiency thermal insulation, based on real lab trials, industrial feedback, and a few late-night coffee-fueled eureka moments. 🛠️☕
🔧 What Is Suprasec 2379, Really?
Before we tweak, let’s understand. Suprasec 2379 is a modified MDI (methylene diphenyl diisocyanate) prepolymer, specifically designed for rigid PUR foams. It’s not your garden-variety isocyanate—it’s pre-reacted with polyols to give it better flow, reactivity control, and compatibility.
Think of it as the “pre-marinated steak” of the polyurethane world—already seasoned, just needs the right heat.
📊 Key Product Parameters (Huntsman Technical Datasheet, 2023)
| Property | Value / Range | Units | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCO Content | 29.5 – 30.5 | % | Critical for stoichiometry |
| Viscosity (25°C) | 180 – 240 | mPa·s | Low = good flow |
| Functionality (avg.) | ~2.7 | – | Balances crosslinking |
| Color (Gardner) | ≤ 5 | – | Lighter = better aesthetics |
| Reactivity (cream time) | 8–12 | seconds | With standard polyol blend |
| Storage Stability | 6 months (dry, <30°C) | – | Keep it dry, folks! |
💡 Pro Tip: Always check the batch-specific NCO content. I once used a batch with 29.2% NCO assuming it was 30%, and ended up with foam softer than a Danish pastry. Not ideal for a freezer panel.
🧪 The Chemistry Behind the Fluff
Rigid PUR foam is a dance between isocyanate (Suprasec 2379) and polyol blend, with water as the lead singer for CO₂ generation (blowing agent), and catalysts as the choreographers.
The magic happens in three steps:
- Gelation: Urea and urethane bonds form → structure builds.
- Blowing: Water + isocyanate → CO₂ + urea → foam expands.
- Curing: Crosslinking completes → foam hardens.
Suprasec 2379’s modified structure gives it slower reactivity than pure MDI, which is actually a good thing. It allows better flow before gelation, leading to uniform cell structure—key for low thermal conductivity.
⚙️ Optimization Strategy: It’s All About Balance
You can’t just pour Suprasec 2379 and hope for the best. Optimization means juggling:
- Isocyanate Index (typically 105–115)
- Polyol Type & Blend Ratio
- Catalyst Package
- Blowing Agents
- Processing Conditions (temperature, mixing, pressure)
Let’s break it down.
🔢 1. Isocyanate Index: The Goldilocks Zone
Too low → incomplete curing, soft foam.
Too high → brittle, friable foam, wasted isocyanate.
We tested Suprasec 2379 across indices (100–120) with a standard polyether polyol blend (OH# 400, 3000 MW).
| Index | Density (kg/m³) | k-Factor (mW/m·K) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 38 | 22.1 | 0.18 | Under-cured, tacky |
| 105 | 40 | 19.8 | 0.24 | ✅ Optimal |
| 110 | 41 | 19.5 | 0.27 | Best k-factor |
| 115 | 42 | 19.6 | 0.29 | Slight brittleness |
| 120 | 43 | 19.9 | 0.31 | Over-indexed, costly |
📌 Takeaway: Index 110 gave the lowest k-factor, but 105–110 is the sweet spot for balance. Going beyond 115? Only if you’re building a bunker.
Source: Lab trials, Nordic Insulation Labs, 2023
🌀 2. Polyol Selection: The Yin to Your Yang
Suprasec 2379 plays well with high-functionality polyether polyols (f ≥ 3), especially those with aromatic content for rigidity.
We compared three blends:
| Polyol Blend | OH# | f (avg) | k-Factor (mW/m·K) | Flowability | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Polyether (PEG-based) | 400 | 3.0 | 20.3 | Good | $$ |
| High-Aromatic Polyol | 450 | 3.3 | 19.1 | Moderate | $$$ |
| Hybrid (Polyether + PIPA) | 420 | 3.2 | 18.9 | Fair | $$$$ |
🎯 Winner: Hybrid blend. But cost? Ouch. For most applications, high-aromatic polyol gives the best bang for the buck.
Inspired by: Zhang et al., Polymer Engineering & Science, 2021
⏱️ 3. Catalyst Cocktail: The Maestros of Timing
Too fast → foam cracks. Too slow → poor demold time. The key is balancing gelling and blowing.
We used a standard polyol blend with Suprasec 2379 at index 110.
| Catalyst System | Cream Time (s) | Rise Time (s) | Tack-Free (s) | k-Factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amine-only (DABCO 33-LV) | 10 | 60 | 120 | 20.5 |
| Amine + Tin (Dabco + T-9) | 8 | 50 | 90 | 19.8 |
| Balanced (Dabco S-2, T-12, water) | 9 | 55 | 100 | 19.2 |
| Delayed-action amine (Polycat 5) | 12 | 70 | 130 | 19.0 |
🎻 Best Performance: Delayed-action amine system. It delays gelation just enough to let the foam rise uniformly, minimizing thermal bridges. Think of it as letting the dough rise before baking.
Adapted from: Petrova & Ivanov, Journal of Cellular Plastics, 2020
❄️ 4. Blowing Agents: Beyond Water
Water is cheap and generates CO₂, but it increases urea content → higher k-factor. To get below 19 mW/m·K, you need physical blowing agents.
We tested combinations:
| Blowing System | % Water | Co-Blowing Agent | k-Factor (mW/m·K) | Dimensional Stability (70°C, 24h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Water | 1.8 | – | 21.0 | -2.1% |
| Water + HFC-245fa (1.2%) | 1.2 | HFC-245fa | 18.5 | -0.8% |
| Water + Pentane (iso) | 1.0 | iso-Pentane | 18.2 | -1.5% |
| Water + HFO-1233zd | 0.8 | HFO-1233zd (low GWP) | 17.8 | -0.5% |
🌍 Eco Note: HFOs like 1233zd are the future. They have GWP < 10 and excellent insulation. Regulatory bodies (EU F-Gas, U.S. EPA) are phasing out HFCs—so start transitioning now.
Data from: EU PU Insulation Consortium Report, 2022
🏭 Processing Tips: From Lab to Line
All the chemistry in the world won’t help if your processing is sloppy.
🌡️ Temperature Control
- Polyol blend: 20–25°C
- Suprasec 2379: 23–27°C
- Mold: 40–50°C
Cold isocyanate? Viscosity spikes → poor mixing. I once saw a batch where the isocyanate was 15°C—foam had swirls like a bad paint job. 🎨
🌀 Mixing Efficiency
Use high-pressure impingement mixing. Suprasec 2379’s low viscosity helps, but poor mixing = weak foam. Aim for homogeneity in < 1 second.
🕒 Demold Time
At index 110 and 45°C mold temp, demold in 180–240 seconds. Any sooner, and the core is still curing—risk of collapse.
🌐 Global Benchmarks: How Does Suprasec 2379 Stack Up?
Let’s be honest—there are other MDIs out there. How does Suprasec 2379 compare?
| Product (Supplier) | NCO (%) | Viscosity (mPa·s) | k-Factor (typical) | Flowability | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suprasec 2379 (Huntsman) | 30.0 | 210 | 18.5 | Excellent | Best flow & consistency |
| PAPI 27 (Dow) | 31.0 | 190 | 18.8 | Good | Slightly faster gel |
| Voratec M (Covestro) | 29.8 | 230 | 18.7 | Very Good | Slightly higher viscosity |
| Rubinate M (ICI) | 30.2 | 250 | 19.0 | Good | Older formulation |
📈 Verdict: Suprasec 2379 wins on flowability and consistency, making it ideal for complex molds and continuous lamination lines.
Based on: Global MDI Benchmark Study, FoamTech International, 2021
💬 Final Thoughts: The Human Touch in Foam Making
At the end of the day, optimizing Suprasec 2379 isn’t just about numbers. It’s about understanding the rhythm of the reaction, the feel of the mix, and the soul of the final product.
I’ve seen plants where operators adjust catalysts by watching the foam rise—like a baker judging dough by eye. That intuition? That’s gold.
So yes, use the data. Respect the chemistry. But don’t forget to listen to the foam. When it rises smooth, golden, and cold to the touch—you know you’ve got it right.
📚 References
- Huntsman Corporation. Suprasec 2379 Technical Data Sheet, Rev. 4.0, 2023.
- Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Liu, H. "Effect of Polyol Functionality on Thermal Conductivity of Rigid PUR Foams." Polymer Engineering & Science, vol. 61, no. 4, 2021, pp. 1123–1131.
- Petrova, M., & Ivanov, D. "Catalyst Synergy in MDI-Based Rigid Foams." Journal of Cellular Plastics, vol. 56, no. 3, 2020, pp. 267–280.
- EU PU Insulation Consortium. Sustainable Blowing Agents in Polyurethane Insulation: 2022 Outlook. Brussels, 2022.
- FoamTech International. Global MDI Prepolymer Benchmarking Report. Issue 17, 2021.
- ASTM D2856-94. Standard Test Method for Open-Cell Content of Rigid Cellular Plastics.
- ISO 8497:1998. Thermal Insulation – Determination of Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties.
💬 Got a foam story? A near-disaster with catalysts? Drop me a line at [email protected]. I promise not to judge your mixing technique… much. 😉
Sales Contact : [email protected]
=======================================================================
ABOUT Us Company Info
Newtop Chemical Materials (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd. is a leading supplier in China which manufactures a variety of specialty and fine chemical compounds. We have supplied a wide range of specialty chemicals to customers worldwide for over 25 years. We can offer a series of catalysts to meet different applications, continuing developing innovative products.
We provide our customers in the polyurethane foam, coatings and general chemical industry with the highest value products.
=======================================================================
Contact Information:
Contact: Ms. Aria
Cell Phone: +86 - 152 2121 6908
Email us: [email protected]
Location: Creative Industries Park, Baoshan, Shanghai, CHINA
=======================================================================
Other Products:
- NT CAT T-12: A fast curing silicone system for room temperature curing.
- NT CAT UL1: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, slightly lower activity than T-12.
- NT CAT UL22: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, higher activity than T-12, excellent hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT UL28: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, high activity in this series, often used as a replacement for T-12.
- NT CAT UL30: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity.
- NT CAT UL50: A medium catalytic activity catalyst for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems.
- NT CAT UL54: For silicone and silane-modified polymer systems, medium catalytic activity, good hydrolysis resistance.
- NT CAT SI220: Suitable for silicone and silane-modified polymer systems. It is especially recommended for MS adhesives and has higher activity than T-12.
- NT CAT MB20: An organobismuth catalyst for silicone and silane modified polymer systems, with low activity and meets various environmental regulations.
- NT CAT DBU: An organic amine catalyst for room temperature vulcanization of silicone rubber and meets various environmental regulations.