The Use of Peroxides for Photovoltaic Solar Film in Novel Encapsulant Materials Beyond Traditional EVA for Enhanced Performance

When we talk about solar panels, most of us picture those shiny, glassy rectangles sitting on rooftops or in sprawling solar farms. But behind that sleek exterior lies a world of complex materials, chemical reactions, and engineering marvels. One of the unsung heroes in this world is the encapsulant — the material that holds everything together, protects the delicate solar cells, and ensures the panel lasts for decades under the sun.

Traditionally, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) has been the go-to encapsulant in photovoltaic (PV) modules. It’s like the reliable sidekick in a superhero movie — always there, always doing the job. But as solar technology evolves and the demand for higher efficiency and durability increases, the industry is starting to ask: What else is out there?

Enter peroxides — not the kind you use to bleach your hair, but a class of chemical compounds that are quietly revolutionizing the world of solar encapsulation. In this article, we’ll dive into the role of peroxides in novel encapsulant materials, how they compare to traditional EVA, and why they might be the key to the next generation of high-performance solar films.

The Role of Encapsulants in PV Modules

Before we jump into peroxides, let’s take a moment to understand what encapsulants actually do in a solar panel.

Encapsulants are the glue that holds the solar cell sandwich together. They are placed between the solar cells and the front glass (usually tempered glass) and the backsheet. Their primary functions include:

Mechanical protection: Shielding the fragile solar cells from physical stress and vibration.
Environmental protection: Preventing moisture, oxygen, and other contaminants from corroding the cells.
Adhesion: Ensuring that all components stick together and maintain structural integrity.
Optical transparency: Allowing maximum sunlight to reach the cells without interference.

Traditional EVA has been the standard encapsulant for over 30 years. It’s relatively inexpensive, easy to process, and provides decent protection. But as solar panels are expected to perform for 25–30 years in increasingly harsh environments, EVA’s limitations are becoming more apparent.

The Limitations of EVA

While EVA has served the solar industry well, it’s not without its flaws. Here’s a quick rundown of EVA’s shortcomings:

Limitation	Description
Yellowing	Over time, EVA tends to yellow, reducing light transmission and panel efficiency.
Moisture Sensitivity	EVA can absorb moisture, leading to corrosion and delamination.
Limited UV Resistance	Prolonged exposure to UV radiation can degrade EVA, leading to microcracks and power loss.
Thermal Instability	EVA softens at high temperatures, which can cause deformation and poor long-term reliability.

These issues are particularly problematic in hot, humid, or coastal environments, where solar panels are often installed but face extreme weather conditions.

Enter Peroxides: The New Kids on the Block

Peroxides are a class of oxygen-rich chemical compounds with the general formula ROOR, where R represents an organic group. They are known for their strong oxidizing properties and ability to initiate cross-linking reactions in polymers.

In the context of solar encapsulation, peroxides are being used to modify and enhance the properties of polymer-based encapsulants, such as polyolefins, silicones, and thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs). By triggering cross-linking, peroxides help create a more robust, durable network structure within the encapsulant material.

Why Peroxides?

So, why are peroxides gaining traction in the solar encapsulant world? Let’s break it down.

1. Cross-Linking Powerhouse

Peroxides act as initiators for cross-linking reactions, which means they help polymer chains form strong, interconnected networks. This results in:

Improved mechanical strength
Better resistance to thermal expansion and contraction
Enhanced resistance to moisture and chemical degradation

2. Superior UV and Thermal Stability

Peroxide-cross-linked materials often exhibit superior UV resistance compared to EVA. This means less yellowing and longer life under the sun. Additionally, these materials can withstand higher temperatures without softening or deforming.

3. Low Volatility and Low Outgassing

Unlike EVA, which can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during lamination and operation, peroxide-based systems are generally low-volatility, reducing the risk of gas buildup and potential delamination.

4. Customizable Properties

One of the biggest advantages of using peroxides is the ability to tailor material properties by adjusting the type and concentration of peroxide used. This opens the door to creating encapsulants that are optimized for specific climates and applications.

Novel Encapsulant Materials Using Peroxides

Several peroxide-modified encapsulant materials have emerged in recent years, each with its own set of benefits. Let’s explore some of the most promising ones.

1. Peroxide-Cross-Linked Polyolefins (POs)

Polyolefins like polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) are known for their chemical inertness and low cost. When cross-linked with peroxides, they become much more durable and resistant to environmental stress.

Property	EVA	Peroxide-Cross-Linked PE
UV Resistance	Moderate	High
Moisture Resistance	Moderate	High
Thermal Stability	Moderate	High
Cost	Low	Moderate
Yellowing	Yes	Minimal

2. Silicone-Based Encapsulants

Silicones are inherently UV and thermally stable, making them ideal for high-performance applications. Peroxides are used to initiate the curing process, resulting in a highly cross-linked silicone network.

Property	EVA	Silicone with Peroxide
Transparency	High	Very High
Flexibility	Moderate	High
Temperature Resistance	Up to 150°C	Up to 200°C
Adhesion	Good	Excellent
Cost	Low	High

3. Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) with Peroxide Cross-Linkers

TPU is known for its excellent mechanical properties and flexibility. When combined with peroxides, it becomes even more durable and resistant to environmental degradation.

Property	EVA	TPU with Peroxide
Mechanical Strength	Moderate	High
Flexibility	Moderate	High
Weather Resistance	Moderate	High
Processing Ease	Easy	Moderate
Cost	Low	Moderate-High

Real-World Performance: How Do They Stack Up?

Let’s take a look at some real-world data and case studies comparing EVA and peroxide-based encapsulants.

Case Study 1: Coastal Environment (Florida, USA)

Parameter	EVA Module	Silicone with Peroxide Module
Power Loss after 5 Years	7%	2%
Yellowing Index	12	2
Moisture Ingress	Moderate	Minimal
Adhesion Loss	Yes	No

Source: NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory), Field Performance of Encapsulant Materials in Humid Climates, 2021.

Case Study 2: Desert Environment (Arizona, USA)

Parameter	EVA Module	TPU with Peroxide Module
Thermal Cycling Survivability	85%	98%
UV Degradation	Moderate	Very Low
Mechanical Integrity	Moderate	High
Cost per Watt	$0.30	$0.34

Source: Sandia National Laboratories, High-Temperature Encapsulant Testing for Desert PV Applications, 2020.

Challenges and Considerations

As with any new technology, there are challenges to adopting peroxide-based encapsulants.

1. Higher Material Cost

While peroxide-modified materials offer better performance, they often come with a higher price tag. For large-scale utility projects, cost is a critical factor.

2. Processing Complexity

Some peroxide-based systems require specialized curing conditions, such as high temperatures or controlled atmospheres, which can increase manufacturing complexity.

3. Recycling and End-of-Life Concerns

Cross-linked polymers are more difficult to recycle than thermoplastic materials like EVA. As the solar industry moves toward circular economy models, this could become a hurdle.

4. Long-Term Field Data Still Emerging

While lab tests and early field data are promising, long-term performance data (25+ years) is still limited for many of these materials.

Future Outlook and Industry Trends

The solar industry is at a crossroads. As demand for higher efficiency, longer lifespan, and better environmental performance grows, so does the need for advanced encapsulant materials.

According to a 2023 report by Research and Markets, the global market for solar encapsulant materials is expected to grow at a CAGR of 8.2% from 2023 to 2030, with peroxide-modified materials capturing an increasing share.

Some of the key trends include:

Hybrid encapsulants combining the best properties of EVA and peroxide-based systems.
Nanocomposite additives to further enhance UV resistance and mechanical strength.
Smart encapsulants with self-healing or adaptive properties.
Sustainability-focused formulations, including bio-based peroxides and recyclable cross-linked polymers.

Conclusion: The Dawn of a New Era in Solar Encapsulation

The sun may be eternal, but our solar panels are not. To ensure they last as long as possible and perform as well as possible, we need to rethink the materials that hold them together.

Peroxides may not be the flashiest innovation in the solar world, but they’re quietly enabling a new era of encapsulant materials that are more durable, more efficient, and more adaptable to the real world.

From cross-linked polyolefins to silicone systems and TPUs, peroxide-based encapsulants are proving that there’s life beyond EVA — and it’s a life worth investing in.

As the solar industry continues to evolve, the choice of encapsulant will play a crucial role in determining the success, longevity, and sustainability of the panels we install today.

So next time you look at a solar panel, remember: the real magic isn’t just in the cells — it’s also in the invisible glue that holds it all together.

References

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2021). Field Performance of Encapsulant Materials in Humid Climates. Golden, CO.
Sandia National Laboratories. (2020). High-Temperature Encapsulant Testing for Desert PV Applications. Albuquerque, NM.
Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Wang, J. (2022). "Advances in Peroxide-Cross-Linked Polymers for Solar Encapsulation." Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 235, 111489.
Research and Markets. (2023). Global Solar Encapsulant Market Outlook to 2030. Dublin, Ireland.
Chen, X., & Liu, M. (2021). "Comparative Study of EVA and Silicone-Based Encapsulants in Photovoltaic Modules." Renewable Energy, 172, 1089–1098.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Photovoltaic System Reliability and Performance: A Global Perspective. Paris, France.
Wang, T., Zhao, L., & Sun, Y. (2020). "UV Degradation and Stabilization of Polymer Encapsulants in Solar Panels." Polymer Degradation and Stability, 182, 109372.
Liu, Q., & Zhang, F. (2022). "Recent Developments in Cross-Linked Thermoplastic Polyurethanes for Solar Applications." Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 139(24), 52138.
Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA). (2023). U.S. Solar Industry Year in Review. Washington, D.C.
Fraunhofer ISE. (2022). Photovoltaics Report: Status and Trends of PV Technology and Market. Freiburg, Germany.

🌞 If you made it this far, congratulations! You’re now officially a solar encapsulant enthusiast. Who knew glue could be so fascinating?

Sales Contact：[email protected]