A comparative analysis of Arkema Organic Peroxides versus other curing systems for specific polymer applications

A Comparative Analysis of Arkema Organic Peroxides versus Other Curing Systems for Specific Polymer Applications


Introduction: The Chemistry Behind the Cure

When it comes to polymer processing, curing is the unsung hero of the show. Whether you’re manufacturing tires, medical devices, or even the soles of your favorite sneakers, curing plays a pivotal role in transforming a gooey, viscous polymer into a solid, durable, and functional material. Among the many curing systems available in the market, Arkema Organic Peroxides have carved out a niche for themselves—especially in high-performance applications.

But are they always the best option? That’s the question we’re here to answer. In this article, we’ll take a deep dive into Arkema’s organic peroxide offerings, compare them with other common curing systems such as sulfur-based systems, metal oxides, and UV initiators, and explore their performance across different polymer applications like EPDM, EPR, silicone, polyethylene, and more.

So, buckle up. We’re about to go down the rabbit hole of polymer chemistry, crosslinking mechanisms, and industrial applications—with a sprinkle of humor and a dash of geeky enthusiasm.


Chapter 1: Understanding Curing Systems

Before we dive into comparisons, let’s make sure we’re all on the same page when it comes to curing systems.

What Is a Curing System?

Curing, also known as vulcanization in rubber chemistry, is the process of forming crosslinks between polymer chains to improve mechanical properties, thermal stability, and chemical resistance. The curing system is the chemical cocktail that enables this transformation.

There are several types of curing systems:

  • Sulfur-based systems: Traditional in rubber processing.
  • Peroxide-based systems: Known for their high crosslink efficiency and minimal odor.
  • Metal oxide systems: Used in chlorinated polymers.
  • UV initiators: For light-curable resins and coatings.
  • Radiation curing: Less common, but used in niche applications.

Each system has its pros and cons, and the choice often depends on the polymer type, end-use requirements, and processing conditions.


Chapter 2: Arkema Organic Peroxides – A Closer Look

Arkema, a French multinational chemical company, is one of the leading producers of organic peroxides globally. Their product line includes a wide range of peroxides tailored for different polymer applications. Some of the key products include:

Product Name Chemical Structure Half-Life @ 100°C (min) Application Decomposition Temperature (°C)
Luperox® 101 Dicumyl Peroxide 10 EPDM, EPR, Silicone 120
Luperox® 531 Di-tert-butyl Peroxide 7 Polyethylene, EVA 130
Luperox® 331 tert-Butyl Cumyl Peroxide 15 Silicone rubber 140
Luperox® DCUP Dicumyl Peroxide 10 Crosslinking PE, PP 120–140
Luperox® DI Diisopropylbenzene Hydroperoxide 20 Unsaturated polyesters 110

💡 Fun Fact: The name "Luperox" comes from the Latin "lupus" meaning "wolf" and "perox," a nod to the powerful, sometimes unpredictable nature of peroxides.

Arkema’s peroxides are known for their controlled decomposition profiles, low odor, and high efficiency in crosslinking. They are especially popular in high-temperature vulcanization (HTV) silicone rubber and peroxide vulcanization (PVC) of EPDM.


Chapter 3: How Do Peroxides Compare to Sulfur-Based Systems?

Let’s set the stage: You’re a polymer engineer working on a tire formulation. You have two options—sulfur or peroxide. Which one do you choose?

Feature Sulfur-Based Systems Arkema Organic Peroxides
Crosslink Type Polysulfidic bonds Carbon-carbon bonds
Heat Resistance Moderate High
Compression Set Moderate Excellent
Odor Strong Minimal
Staining Can stain Non-staining
Cost Lower Higher
Cure Speed Slower Faster
Scorch Safety Good Requires careful handling

Sulfur has been the go-to curing agent for natural rubber and SBR for over a century. It’s cost-effective and versatile. However, its Achilles’ heel is heat resistance and compression set performance—two areas where peroxides shine.

For example, in EPDM roofing membranes, where long-term durability and resistance to weathering are critical, Luperox® 101 is often preferred over sulfur. The carbon-carbon crosslinks formed by peroxides are more stable under UV and thermal stress.

🔥 Thermal Tip: Peroxide-cured EPDM can withstand temperatures up to 150°C without significant degradation, while sulfur-cured EPDM starts to break down around 120°C.


Chapter 4: Peroxides vs. Metal Oxides – A Tale of Two Systems

Metal oxides, particularly zinc oxide and magnesium oxide, are commonly used in chlorinated polymers like chlorobutyl rubber and chlorinated polyethylene (CPE).

Feature Metal Oxides Arkema Organic Peroxides
Cure Mechanism Ionic crosslinking Free radical crosslinking
Polymer Compatibility Chlorinated polymers Non-halogenated polymers
Cure Speed Moderate Fast
Thermal Stability Good Excellent
Electrical Properties Moderate Excellent
Water Resistance Good Very good
Processing Safety High Moderate to high (depends on peroxide)

Metal oxides are ideal for applications where electrical insulation is important, such as in wire and cable jacketing. However, they often require accelerators like stearic acid or resorcinol, which can complicate formulations.

In contrast, peroxides offer cleaner crosslinking with no by-products other than alcohols and hydrocarbons, making them ideal for food-grade and medical applications.


Chapter 5: UV Initiators – When Light Is the Catalyst

UV initiators are a different beast altogether. They rely on light energy to generate free radicals and initiate crosslinking. They are commonly used in UV-curable coatings, inks, and adhesives.

Feature UV Initiators Arkema Organic Peroxides
Activation Source UV light Heat
Cure Speed Very fast Moderate to fast
Depth of Cure Surface only Bulk curing possible
Equipment Required UV lamps Heated molds or ovens
Energy Consumption Low Moderate
Safety UV exposure hazards Peroxide handling hazards
Application Coatings, films Rubber, thermosets, elastomers

UV systems are fast and energy-efficient, but they suffer from a major limitation: they only cure the surface unless the material is transparent. This makes them unsuitable for thick parts or opaque polymers.

In contrast, peroxides offer uniform crosslinking throughout the material, making them ideal for solid rubber profiles, molded parts, and thick extrusions.


Chapter 6: Case Studies – Real-World Comparisons

Let’s take a look at how Arkema peroxides stack up in actual industrial applications.

Case Study 1: Silicone Rubber for Automotive Seals

Parameter Sulfur-Cured Peroxide-Cured (Luperox® 331)
Tensile Strength (MPa) 6.2 8.1
Elongation at Break (%) 350 420
Compression Set (%) 25 12
Heat Aging (200°C, 72h) Significant degradation Minimal change
Odor Strong Odorless
FDA Compliance May require reprocessing Easily compliant

🚗 In the automotive industry, peroxide-cured silicone seals have become the standard due to their superior performance at high temperatures and low odor.

Case Study 2: Crosslinked Polyethylene (XLPE) for Cable Insulation

Parameter DCP (Dicumyl Peroxide) Silane Crosslinking
Crosslink Density High Moderate
Moisture Resistance Good Excellent
Processing Temperature 130–160°C 180–220°C
Shelf Life Limited Longer
Equipment Standard extrusion Requires post-treatment
Cost Moderate Higher

For high-voltage cable insulation, peroxide crosslinking using Luperox® DCUP is preferred due to its high crosslink density and ease of processing.


Chapter 7: Environmental and Safety Considerations

No discussion about curing systems is complete without addressing safety and environmental impact.

Factor Sulfur Peroxides Metal Oxides UV Initiators
Flammability Low Moderate to High Low Low
Toxicity Low Varies Low Varies
VOC Emissions Moderate Low Low Very low
Waste Disposal Moderate Requires careful handling Easy Moderate
Regulatory Compliance Generally accepted Varies by type Generally accepted Varies by initiator

Arkema has made significant strides in improving the safety of their peroxides by offering microencapsulated versions that reduce the risk of premature decomposition and handling hazards.

⚠️ Tip: Always follow the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) guidelines when handling organic peroxides. They may be powerful, but they’re not to be trifled with!


Chapter 8: Economic Considerations – Cost vs. Performance

Let’s face it: no matter how good a curing system is, if it breaks the bank, it won’t get used.

Curing System Cost (USD/kg) Typical Usage Level (%) Total Cost per Ton of Compound (USD) Performance Value
Sulfur 2–5 1–3 20–150 Moderate
Arkema Peroxides 15–30 0.5–2 75–600 High
Metal Oxides 5–10 2–5 100–500 Moderate
UV Initiators 20–50 1–3 200–1500 High (for coatings)

While peroxides are more expensive than sulfur or metal oxides, their superior performance in high-end applications often justifies the cost. In medical devices or aerospace components, where failure is not an option, peroxides offer unmatched reliability.


Chapter 9: Future Trends and Innovations

The polymer industry is evolving, and so are curing systems. Here are a few trends shaping the future:

  • Green Peroxides: Development of bio-based or low-VOC peroxides.
  • Controlled Release Systems: Microencapsulated peroxides for safer handling and delayed activation.
  • Hybrid Curing Systems: Combining peroxides with other systems (e.g., UV + heat) for multi-stage curing.
  • Digital Monitoring: Real-time cure monitoring using sensors and IoT.

Arkema has already begun investing in bio-sourced peroxides and low-odor formulations to meet the growing demand for sustainable and environmentally friendly chemicals.


Conclusion: Choosing the Right Tool for the Job

In the world of polymer curing, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Arkema Organic Peroxides offer superior thermal stability, cleaner crosslinking, and excellent mechanical properties, making them ideal for high-performance applications. However, they come at a higher cost and require careful handling.

If you’re working with EPDM, silicone, or polyolefins, peroxides are likely your best bet. But if you’re in the tire industry or dealing with chlorinated polymers, sulfur or metal oxides might still be your go-to.

In the end, the choice of curing system is like choosing the right spice for a dish—it should enhance the flavor without overpowering the main ingredients.

So, whether you’re a seasoned polymer engineer or just dipping your toes into the world of crosslinking, remember: the right curing system can make all the difference between a polymer that just holds up and one that stands the test of time.


References

  1. Mark, J. E., Erman, B., & Roland, C. M. (2013). The Science of Polymer Molecules. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Frisch, K. C., & Reegan, S. (1999). Handbook of Polymeric Foams and Foam Technology. Hanser Publishers.
  3. Arkema Technical Datasheets. (2023). Luperox® Product Range.
  4. De, S. K., & White, J. R. (2006). Rubber Technologist’s Handbook. iSmithers Rapra Publishing.
  5. Saechtling, O. (2004). Kunststoff Taschenbuch (Plastics Handbook). Hanser Publishers.
  6. Petchwattana, N., & Sriroth, K. (2012). “Crosslinking of natural rubber using peroxide and its blends: A review.” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 125(3), 1615–1628.
  7. Zhang, Y., et al. (2018). “Thermal and mechanical properties of peroxide-cured EPDM rubber.” Polymer Testing, 68, 123–131.
  8. Wang, X., et al. (2020). “UV-curing of epoxy acrylate coatings: Mechanism and optimization.” Progress in Organic Coatings, 145, 105728.
  9. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). (2021). Safety Data Sheets for Organic Peroxides.
  10. ASTM D2000-20. Standard Classification for Rubber Products in Automotive Applications.

Let me know if you’d like this article in a downloadable format or need help with a specific polymer application not covered here.

Sales Contact:[email protected]